

Urgh! Ruined by an Americanisation!
Australian Outback Illuminated

A boring and useless novel
The thinking persons Nick Hornby
You'll never see refs in the same light again!!!

This book is not accurate!One of the reviews was the Rabbi of the very congregation the book is based on "Marc Angel". He wrote: "Birmingham is so eager to show that the "Grandees" are aloof and snobby, that he ignores reality. He interprets things as he wants them to be, not as they are." Rabbi Angel also wrote: "His book is plagued with factual inaccuracies and poor historical perspectives. Unfortunately, many Jews and non-Jews are reading the book and are having their opinions molded by it because they know little or nothing about Sephardim."
The well-respected Sephardic scholar David N. Barocas wrote of the Grandees: "To rely on hearsay information, or to select at random passages from books and then try to weave them into the fabric of one's text or report constitutes in the final analysis a combination of misstatements, incomplete truths and factual omissions tending to present a perverted opinion of an innocent people."
There are many good books out there which are acurate, unfortunatly this is not one of them. It was written by an outsider of the community. It is biased, and does give a good example of the Sephardic community.
Discovering my EthnicityRodolfo Carbonell


A book filled with bias and errorsThe Foundation For The Advancement of Sephardic Studies and Culture wrote: "...Mr. Birmingham addressed a gathering on October 10th, 1968 at Shearith Israel [the very congregation he writes about in his book], Mr. Louis N. Levy, the president of the Foundation, asked Mr. Birmingham whether he proposed to write on the Balkan Sephardim. For some reason the audience burst into laughter and the answer was not heard."
One of the reviews was the Rabbi of the very congregation the book is based on "Marc Angel". He wrote: "Birmingham is so eager to show that the "Grandees" are aloof and snobby, that he ignores reality. He interprets things as he wants them to be, not as they are." Rabbi Angel also wrote: "His book is plagued with factual inaccuracies and poor historical perspectives. Unfortunately, many Jews and non-Jews are reading the book and are having their opinions molded by it because they know little or nothing about Sephardim."
The well-respected Sephardic scholar David N. Barocas wrote of the Grandees: "To rely on hearsay information, or to select at random passages from books and then try to weave them into the fabric of one's text or report constitutes in the final analysis a combination of misstatements, incomplete truths and factual omissions tending to present a perverted opinion of an innocent people."
There are many good books out there which are acurate, unfortunatly this is not one of them. It was written by an outsider of the community. It is biased, and does give a good example of the Sephardic community.
fascinating picture of a closed society

Fast Read"The Golden Dream" is best described as superficial. It takes a swing through the United States usually touching on one aspect or family of the suburb mentioned (all of them very high dollar). It reads like a loosely collected series of magazine articles long on anecdotes and short on depth. River Oaks (Houston) is a send up on the vulgarity of the natives. Scottsdale (Phoenix) is well-scrubbed Barry Goldwater country and Salt Lake City is Mormon Town. I had the impression Mr. Birmingham had spent, at most, ten minutes west of the Mississippi River. He does marginally better in the central states, but home is the Northeast.
If I were a resident of any of these communities, I would be upset at the narrow focus of attention and probably wonder if he had ever actually set foot in the town he was writing about. However, "Golden Dream" is for the most part good-natured. You don't learn anything new, but he has a few good anecdotes. It is a little light for the beach, maybe a good bus read.
2-1/2 stars.
-sweetmolly-Amazon


Thanh Ho delivers more than pizza

12 year old out dated book
Outdated Material
Important information for anyone planning a log home

Not too bad, but could be betterFirst of all, I don't know much about Portugal, so I'm not in a position to judge the accuracy of Birmingham's book. Yet I didn't notice anything blatantly absurd, which is what everybody else seems to think, and it strikes me as odd that such a well-known scholar on Portuguese and Portuguese Imperial history as David Birmingham should suddenly turn out a piece of complete junk, which is what the reviewers below claim. I wish they had pointed out what his mistakes actually were. And as for the one reviewer's assertion that Birmingham insults the Portuguese, I don't know what he's talking about, nor why Birmingham would have wanted to insult them. The author often criticized the brutality of Portugal's war in Angola, but I don't think that's a reason to lay into him.
The major fault of the book is that it's just too short. Even though it's advertised as a "concise history", I felt like Birmingham just didn't write enough. How can anybody cover 2,000 years of Portuguese history in 192 pages? If Birmingham had added even a hundred pages more, it would have made this book a lot better and still not too long. Maybe we should blame his editors.
Other gripes: Birmingham should have written more about Portuguese culture, such as literature, art, and music. His "Concise History" is not just a political history, and he manages to tie in some interesting sections on social and economic history, but the book leans heavily toward politics.
Maybe too conciseFirst, I was suprised with the things I learned of its governmental and social history. It is not the typical western European country, but nonetheless has held its own. I did not realize that Britain played such a big role.
Although I learned a bit about the government and economy (and through this, a little about the population), I did not see much about the humanities and arts. The author does mention that as the country was getting gold from its colonies, it built some beautiful buildings. Nothing else was covered. I would like to know more about the arts, and this book does not give that.
The book is also not the quickest read. Given that it is a history, I would like things to be in chronological order. Birmingham will follow some actions a few decades forward to show the outcome, but then jump back to where he was without comment. This makes the flow a little distracting. I found myself jumping back a few pages to try to follow the narrative. Not the easiest of tasks.
If you know nothing about Portugal, this book will give you a brief glimpse which will get you on the right path to understanding Portugal, but it by no means gives you the most authoritative or the most readable history.
Pretty good. Could be better.

I think I have been cheated!!
Very disappointed
Waste of time and money

Don't buy this book for yourself!!I disappointed about this book very very much.